Merry Christmas

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, full of grace and truth.

In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets; in these last days, he spoke to us through a son, whom he made heir of all things and through whom he created the universe, who is the refulgence of his glory, the very imprint of his being, and who sustains all things by his mighty word.

Newtown Remembered

I continue to stand with those who remember the victims of all violent incidents, especially in America, including the horrific shooting in the Newtown Connecticut School. I am increasingly saddened by the tragic loss of life and by the struggle of those who survive. I am also saddened by this nation's reaction to these events.

I agree that the 2nd Amendment is an unambiguous right to own and carry firearms, although not specifically as a check against government malfeasance, as suggested by the gun control crowd. Its purpose is necessary to the security of a free State.

I'm not surprised that the recent news has upset people (again) and created yet another opportunity to speak out against gun ownership. Opponents of the Second Amendment press its defenders to produce evidence that law abiding citizens use guns for self-defense.

Although it happens almost every day these stories rarely make the news, and when it does opponents are reluctant to believe it. So, let's balance this latest news story: Recently, two armed homeowners captured two escaped fugitives, who killed two guards a week prior.

Yes ... an armed citizen brought their flight to an end. Our thanks go to the local, state and federal law enforcement officers who assisted in the manhunt ... but don’t forget the responsible use of a firearm by a citizen that made their capture possible.

You can outlaw bombs, guns, knives, trucks, clowns, fire crackers, and balloons, but that still won't curb violence.

Why is the focus still on the tools used during a crime instead of the underlying causes of crime? If you continue to let our nation’s leaders, the media, or anyone else distract you from the truth then you are part of the problem. Be part of the solution: Guns are just a tool, they are not the problem!

Thanks be to God

For the fruits of his creation, thanks be to God.
For his gifts to every nation, thanks be to God.
For the plowing, sowing, reaping,
Silent growth while we are sleeping,
Future needs in earth's safekeeping,
Thanks be to God.

In the just reward of labor, God's will be done.
In the help we give our neighbor, God's will be done.
In our worldwide task of caring, for the hungry and despairing,
In the harvests we are sharing, God's will be done.

For the harvests of the Spirit, thanks be to God.
For the good we all inherit, thanks be to God.
For the wonders that astound us, for the truths that still confound us,
Most of all that love has found us, thanks be to God.

Green Thing

Every time we go to the grocery store we're reminded about saving the environment. Before we had this "green thing" everyone returned their milk bottles, soda bottles, and beer bottles to the store. The store sent them back to the plant to be washed, sterilized, and refilled, so it could use the same bottles over and over: They really were recycled. Grocery stores bagged our groceries in brown paper bags that we reused for numerous things like household garbage bags. Even better we used the brown paper bags as book covers for our schoolbooks to ensure that public property (the books were provided for our use by the school) was not defaced by our scribbling. We were also able to personalize our books on the brown paper bags.

Yes, we were already working "green": We walked up stairs, because we didn't have an escalator in every store and office building. We walked to the grocery store and didn't climb into a powerful machine every time we had to go two blocks. We washed the baby's diapers because we didn't have the throwaway kind. We dried clothes on a line, not in a machine gobbling up energy: Wind and solar power really did dry our clothes. Kids got hand-me-down clothes from their brothers or sisters, not something brand-new.

Yes, we were already living "green": We had one TV or radio in the house; not a TV in every room, and that TV had a small screen the size of a handkerchief, not a huge screen the size of a garage door. In the kitchen, we blended and stirred by hand because we didn't have electric machines to do it for us. When we packaged a fragile item to send in the mail, we  used a recycled box and wadded up old newspapers to cushion it, not Styrofoam peanuts or plastic bubble wrap. We didn't fire up an engine and burn gasoline just to cut the lawn; we used a push mower that ran on human power. We exercised by working and we didn't need to go to a health club to run on treadmills that operate on electricity.

Yes, we were already thinking "green": We drank from a fountain when we were thirsty instead of using a cup or a plastic bottle every time we had a drink of water. We refilled writing pens with ink instead of buying a new pen, and we replaced the razor blades in a razor instead of throwing away the whole thing just because the blade got dull. We had one electrical outlet in a room, or if we were lucky one electrical outlet on each wall, not an entire bank of sockets to power a dozen gadgets.

No, the problem isn't that older generations "did not care enough to save our environment for future generations". They took streetcars or busses, and their kids rode their bikes to school or walked instead of turning their moms into a 24-hour taxi service in the family's SUV, which costs what a whole house used to. So the next time you use that computerized screen in your all electric vehicle to receive a signal beamed from a satellite 23,000 miles out in space in order to find your local grocery store, think about what you're doing.

Choose Hope

Mark Your Calendars

Ensuring the Continuity of our Species: It doesn’t look good for the home team. (Part 4 of 4)

The balance of nature

The egalitarian (1) and equitable (2) societies could produce sustainable civilizations and avoid collapse, even with a high ratio of non-workers. Social collapse was more likely after people overreached and depleted natural resources. Importantly, even without any social stratification, collapse can occur if a society exhausts its natural resources.

In the unequal (3) society, however, collapse is almost unavoidable. This is the scenario that mirrors our current globalized societies, even here in the United States.

The income gap

The researchers wrote, "The scenarios most closely reflecting the reality of our world today are found in the third group of experiments, where we introduced economic stratification. Under such conditions, referring to uneven wealth distribution, we find that collapse is difficult to avoid."

Other recent research backs up the authors' claims: A 2012 study from the journal American Sociological Review shows that the income share of the top 1 percent of Americans grew rapidly after 1980. We often hear that the top 1 percent now hold more wealth than the other 99 percent combined.

Meanwhile, the bottom three-quarters of the U.S. population has seen slow economic growth, with predictable results. A 2011 study published in the journal Psychological Science found that happiness, trust in others, and life satisfaction plummet when income inequality is high.

Technology won't save you

For those who believe that there must be a technological fix to all this despair and destruction, the researchers found that the historical record provides "testimony to the fact that advanced, sophisticated, complex and creative civilizations can be both fragile and impermanent.

The authors wrote that “It may be reasonable to believe that modern civilization, armed with its greater technological capacity, scientific knowledge, and energy resources, will be able to survive and endure whatever crises historical societies succumbed to.

But [our] brief overview of collapses demonstrates not only the ubiquity of the phenomenon, but also the extent to which advanced, complex and powerful societies are susceptible to collapse."

All is not lost

The authors suggest that, “If societies can moderate the two factors that contribute most to social meltdown, 1) the exploitation of natural resources, and 2) the uneven distribution of wealth, collapse can be avoided and the society can reach equilibrium.

To accomplish this, the per-capita rate of depletion of nature must be reduced to a sustainable level, and resources must be distributed in a reasonably equitable fashion.

Given the above suggestion things are not looking good … you’d better repack that Bug Out Bag!

Psych Ward